2017年3月17日 星期五

第三週 The Danish Girl


How The Danish Girl captured the zeitgeist

Few movies capture the popular zeitgeist quite like King's Speech director Tom Hooper's The Danish Girl. It tells the story of the 1930s Danish artist Einar Wegener, played by Eddie Redmayne, who became one of the first people to undergo sex reassignment surgery, having decided to live life as a woman called Lili Elbe. The film also features Wegener's wife Gerda, played by Alicia Vikander.
The Danish Girl comes in a year that has put transgender issues firmly into the spotlight. From the transition of Bruce to Caitlyn Jenner, to the Emmy-winning success of Amazon's series Transparent, even the White House chose to screen The Danish Girl as part of a celebration of LGBT artists.
Ironic, then, that Hooper has said the script was passed around for about 12 years struggling to secure backing because of what was seen as the story's limited appeal.
"I hope it provides a message of hope," says the Oscar-winning Hooper, who has previously worked with Redmayne on Elizabeth I and Les Miserables.
"It's a message that transgender history matters. These were two extraordinary pioneers of the transgender movement who I think history had marginalised."

Facing criticism

Before locking the final cut of the film, he decided to screen the movie to one of Les Miserables' musical directors, who was in the process of transitioning while making the film.
"The lights came up and she had tears on her face, and she said the amazing words, 'How did you know?' She said it was in many respects very true to her own experience and that was for me the most exciting."
Despite this sensitivity to the subject matter, Hooper has faced criticism for not choosing to cast a transgender woman in the title role. He defended the decision, telling Variety that access to trans actors is limited, and that he had always had Redmayne in mind.
"There was something in Eddie that was drawn to the feminine," he says. "He played the girls' parts in school plays. I was a bit like Gerda in the film because Gerda becomes fascinated by the femininity in her husband and starts to paint it. I was fascinated by the femininity in Eddie and wanted to explore it."
The film is as much about Gerda, and her demonstration of unconditional love and acceptance through an experience which is as much a transition for her as for her husband.
"I looked up to her," says Vikander.
"I questioned, would I be able to do what she did. It was an extraordinary experience trying to find that strength because she's never passive. Lili needs to be who she is but Gerda makes the decision to stand by her side. I'm a romantic at heart."
In fact, it is Gerda who suggests her husband dresses as a woman. She asks Wegener to first pose for a painting, but more significantly then suggests he attends a ball dressed as Lili, and she goes on to paint portraits of her husband as a woman.
"You helped bring Lili to life but she was always there," Lili later tells Gerda.
So did Gerda always know that her husband wanted to be a woman?
"She was able to see the inner self of the person she loved… When you know somebody really well, it's not a big surprise when something comes up to the surface," says Vikander.

Award nominations

Vikander's scene-stealing performance, which has been nominated for a Golden Globe and a Screen Actors Guild award, gives the film "tremendous heart", says Hooper.
"It's phenomenal. In her hands Gerda never feels like a victim, which I think is really interesting."

Structure of the Lead
WHAT-became one of the first people to undergo sex reassignment surgery
WHEN- It tells the story of the 1930s
WHY- not given
WHERE- Denmark
WHO- Danish artist Einar Wegener
HOW- not given

Keywords:
firmly   牢牢
pioneers   先鋒
marginalise  邊緣化
sensitivity  靈敏度
feminine   女性
tremendous  巨大

2017年2月25日 星期六

第二週 South Korea's President Park Geun-hye

South Korea's parliament votes to impeach President Park Geun-hye

Seoul, South Korea (CNN)Lawmakers in South Korea's National Assembly voted overwhelmingly Friday to impeach President Park Geun-hye over a corruption scandal. The vote was 234-56, with six abstentions.
The country's Constitutional Court will now deliberate the impeachment motion, a process that could take up to 180 days.
    Park apologized on national TV following the vote, saying she was careless and had caused a "big national chaos" -- an apparent reference to her sharing classified information with a confidante lacking security clearance.
    "I solemnly accept the voices of the National Assembly and the people and sincerely hope that the current confusion will come to an end in an orderly manner," said Park, the country's first female leader.
    "... I will respond to the impeachment judgment of the constitutional court and the investigation of the special prosecutors, following the procedures set by the constitution and the law with (a) calm mind-set and then will accept its decision."
    Prime Minister Hwang Kyo-ahn will be acting President for the duration of the court's deliberation.
    He vowed to "run state affairs in a correct and transparent manner."
    "I earnestly and humbly ask all of you to unite so that the voices on the streets can be sublimated into the driving force behind the effort to overcome the current national crisis," Hwang said.​
    Under the South Korean Constitution, impeachment requires a two-thirds majority of the 300-member legislature to pass.
    Thousands took to the streets to celebrate the news. National Assembly Speaker Chung Sye-kyun made the announcement, saying lawmakers had an obligation to restore order and to execute the functions of the government.
    In a phone call with Defense Minister Han Min-koo, the acting President said that North Korea possibly could use the political upheaval to stir up trouble south of the 38th parallel and that the South Korean military should maintain its readiness.
    "While retaining a watertight national defense posture, the government will work closely with the international community to thoroughly respond to the North Korean nuclear problem," Hwang said.
    Park has faced massive protests since it emerged that her confidante and adviser, Choi Soon-sil, had access to confidential government documents despite holding no official government position.
    Choi is accused of using her relationship with Park to accumulate millions of dollars in donations to her foundations and has been detained after being charged with abuse of power, fraud and coercion.
    Two of Park's former aides also face criminal charges.
    The impeachment is only the country's second. In 2004, late President Roh Moo-hyun was forced out of office for two months.
    Structure of the Lead
    WHAT-impeach President Park Geun-hye  
    WHEN- Friday
    WHY- not given
    WHERE- South Korea
    WHO- Park Geun-hye 
    HOW- not given

    Keywords:
    impeach 彈劾
    corruption 腐敗
    abstention 棄權
    deliberate 商榷
    prosecutor 檢察官
    upheaval 動盪
    
    

    2017年2月13日 星期一

    第一週 The same-sex marriage is a legal right across the United States.

    US Supreme Court rules gay marriage is legal nationwide


    The US Supreme Court has ruled that same-sex marriage is a legal right across the United States.
    It means the 14 states with bans on same-sex marriage will no longer be able to enforce them.
    Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote that the plaintiffs asked "for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right."
    The ruling brings to an end more than a decade of bitter legal battles.
    Same-sex couples in several affected states including Georgia, Michigan, Ohio and Texas rushed to wed on Friday.
    However officials in other states, including Mississippi and Louisiana, said marriages had to wait until procedural issues were addressed.
    President Barack Obama said the ruling was a "victory for America".
    "When all Americans are treated as equal, we are all more free " he said.
    However, Christian conservatives condemned the decision.
    Former Arkansas governor and presidential candidate Mike Huckabee called it "an out-of-control act of unconstitutional, judicial tyranny".
    And Kellie Fiedorek, a lawyer for an anti-gay marriage advocacy group, said the decision "ignored the voices of thousands of Americans".
    Greg Abbott, the governor of Texas, a state where marriages licences will now be issued to same-sex couples, said the justices "have imposed on the entire country their personal views on an issue that the Constitution and the Court's previous decisions reserve to the people of the states".

    At the scene - Paul Blake, BBC News

    Loud cheers erupted outside the court after the ruling was announced, and there were tears, hugs, and cheers of "USA USA USA!".
    A sea of rainbow flags overwhelmed the few anti-gay marriage activists who reacted in disbelief, and the demonstration seemed to turn into a street party.
    A tour bus drove past honking as hundreds cheered the decision.
    One of the demonstrators, Jordan Monaghan, called his mother from his mobile phone amid the celebrations.
    "Hey mom, I'm at the Supreme Court. Your son can have a husband now," Mr Monaghan said.
    Minutes after the ruling, couples in one of the states that had a ban, Georgia, lined up in hope of being wed.
    In Texas, Yasmin Menchaca and her partner Catherine Andrews told the BBC that they are "trying to round up our parents" in order to get married on Friday.
    The two have been together for six years, and had attempted to marry in Washington state - but decided to wait because of the financial burden of flying their parents across the country.
    On social media, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton merely tweeted the word "proud" and the White House changed its Twitter avatar into the rainbow colours.
    The case considered by the court concerned Jim Obergefell, an Ohio resident who was not recognised as the legal widower of his late husband, John Arthur.



    "It's my hope that gay marriage will soon be a thing of the past, and from this day forward it will simply be 'marriage,'" an emotional Mr Obergefell said outside the court.
    Structure of the Lead:
    Who-no given
    What-The US Supreme Court has ruled that same-sex marriage is a legal right across the United States.
    How-no given
    Where-United States.
    Why-no given
    When- no given
    Keywords:
     enforce 執行
    plaintiffs 原告
    dignity 尊嚴
     procedural  程序
    condemned 譴責
    advocacy 倡導

    2017年1月2日 星期一

    第九章 The South China Sea


    Why is the South China Sea contentious?


    Rival countries have wrangled over territory in the South China Sea for centuries, but tension has steadily increased in recent years.
    China, Vietnam, the Philippines, Taiwan, Malaysia and Brunei all have competing claims.
    China has backed its expansive claims with island-building and naval patrols. The US says it does not take sides in territorial disputes, but has sent military ships and planes near disputed islands, calling them "freedom of navigation" operations to ensure access to key shipping and air routes.
    Both sides have accused each other of "militarising" the South China Sea.
    There are fears that the area is becoming a flashpoint, with potentially serious global consequences.

    What is the argument about?

    It is a dispute over territory and sovereignty over ocean areas, and the Paracels and the Spratlys - two island chains claimed in whole or in part by a number of countries.
    Alongside the fully fledged islands, there are dozens of rocky outcrops, atolls, sandbanks and reefs, such as the Scarborough Shoal.

    Why are they worth arguing over?

    Although largely uninhabited, the Paracels and the Spratlys may have reserves of natural resources around them. There has been little detailed exploration of the area, so estimates are largely extrapolated from the mineral wealth of neighbouring areas.
    The sea is also a major shipping route and home to fishing grounds that supply the livelihoods of people across the region.

    Who claims what?


    China claims by far the largest portion of territory - an area defined by the "nine-dash line" which stretches hundreds of miles south and east from its most southerly province of Hainan.
    Beijing says its right to the area goes back centuries to when the Paracel and Spratly island chains were regarded as integral parts of the Chinese nation, and in 1947 it issued a map detailing its claims. It showed the two island groups falling entirely within its territory. Those claims are mirrored by Taiwan.
    However, critics say China has not clarified its claims sufficiently - and that the nine-dash line that appears on Chinese maps encompassing almost the entirety of the South China Sea includes no coordinates.

    It is also not clear whether China claims only land territory within the nine-dash line, or all the territorial waters within the line as well.
    Vietnam hotly disputes China's historical account, saying China had never claimed sovereignty over the islands before the 1940s. Vietnam says it has actively ruled over both the Paracels and the Spratlys since the 17th Century - and has the documents to prove it.
    The other major claimant in the area is the Philippines, which invokes its geographical proximity to the Spratly Islands as the main basis of its claim for part of the grouping.
    Both the Philippines and China lay claim to the Scarborough Shoal (known as Huangyan Island in China) - a little more than 100 miles (160km) from the Philippines and 500 miles from China.
    Malaysia and Brunei also lay claim to territory in the South China Sea that they say falls within their economic exclusion zones, as defined by UNCLOS - the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.
    Brunei does not claim any of the disputed islands, but Malaysia claims a small number of islands in the Spratlys.

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-13748349

    Structure of the Lead:
    Who-no given
    What-Rival countries have wrangled over territory in the South China Sea for centuries
    How-all have competing claims
    Where-no given
    Why-no given
    When- in recent years

    Keywords:
    wrangle   爭吵 
    claim  要求
    disputes  爭議
    clarified  澄清
     potentially  潛在地
    militarising  軍事化
     flashpoint   閃點
    
     
    
    

    2016年12月26日 星期一

    第八篇 Samsung galaxy-note-7

    We may finally know why Samsung's Galaxy Note 7s 'exploded'

    After exploding phones, fireproof boxes, lawsuits and open letters, Samsung has reportedly finished its investigation into what went wrong.
    It's been one of the most discussed technological failures of 2016, but as the dust settles around Samsung's recalled Galaxy Note 7 smartphone, one question remains: what actually went wrong with the phones?
    Samsung may finally have the answer.
    The company has, according to The Investor, ended its investigation as to what caused the flagship phones to explode and has submitted its findings to the regulatory bodies, inluding the Korea Testing Laboratory and UL, an American safety organisation.The findings have not been made public yet but third-party investigators have been investigating the cause of the phone's fires too.
    A manufacturing engineering company, Instrumental, thinks it has found the error, or errors, affecting the flagship phone.
    According to Instrumental's teardown of the device, the Note 7's battery didn't have enough physical room for error. Samsung made the battery thinner, removing thickness margins, meaning the separators between the positive and negative layers may have been too thin, increasing the chance of these elements touching and sparking.In addition, Instrumental pointed out that when batteries charge, chemical processes cause the lithium to migrate and the battery to "mechanically swell". Usually, around 10 per cent extra space is required to compensate for this, but the battery in the Note 7 entirely filled its pocket. This increased the risk of 'explosion'.
    The design wasn't completely reckless, though. Instrumental noted that the battery sits within a CNC-machined pocket, which will protect it from being affected by other internal components. "Looking at the design, Samsung engineers were clearly trying to balance the risk of a super-aggressive manufacturing process to maximise capacity, while attempting to protect it internally," said Instrumnetal's engineers.
    Structure of the Lead
    Who-no given
    What-exploding phones
    How-Samsung has reportedly finished its investigation into
    Where-no given
    Why-no given
    When-no given
    Keywords:
    failures  故障
    flagship  旗艦
     regulatory 監管
    thickness  厚度
     margins  邊距
     lithium  

         

    2016年12月12日 星期一

    第七篇 Islamic State

    Islamic State retakes parts of Syria’s historic Palmyra


    Syrian activists say the Islamic State re-entered the historic city of Palmyra in central Syria on Saturday, pushing back the Russian-backed Syrian army that expelled the group only nine months ago in a highly publicized campaign.
    The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reports that the Islamic State, also known as ISIL or ISIS, "entered Palmyra on Saturday and now occupies its northwest. There is also fighting with the army in the city center," Al Jazeera reports. The observatory says the militants reached the city’s Tadmor Hospital and its strategically located wheat silos.
    The activist-run Palmyra Coordination Collective also reports militants seized the city’s military warehouse and its northern and western neighborhoods after taking several government positions, oil fields, and strategic hilltops in the surrounding countryside in a rapid three-day campaign, the Associated Press reports.
    When the Islamic State took control of Palmyra in July 2015, it destroyed several of the city’s famed ancient Roman monuments and executed its archaeological director.
    The new advances by the group contrast sharply with its defeats in territory it held in Iraq as part of the self-proclaimed caliphate that straddles two countries. Iraqi troops, aided by a U.S.-led coalition, have pushed the militants out of key cities in Iraq and retaken much of Mosul, the group's last major stronghold in Iraq.
    The fight in Palmyra comes one day after U.S.-led coalition forces announced U.S. warplanes destroyed a fleet of 168 oil tanker trucks near the ancient city in the largest such strike against the terror group's finances this year.
    More than 20 aircraft were used to destroy the tanker trucks. The oil in the trucks was worth about $2 million, according to a statement.

    Structure of the Lead
    who- Islamic State
    what-pushing back the Russian-backed Syrian army
    where- historic city of Palmyra
    why-not given
    How-not given 
    When-only nine months ago

    Keywords:
     expelled  驅逐
    campaign  運動
    Observatory  天文台
    strategically  戰略上
    executed  執行
    archaeological  考古

    2016年12月5日 星期一

    第六篇 Barack Obama visit Cuba

    Barack Obama: 'Change is going to happen in Cuba'


      President Barack Obama is in Cuba for a historic three-day visit to the island and talks with its communist leader.
      He is the first sitting US president to visit since the 1959 revolution, which heralded decades of hostility between the two countries.
      Mr Obama said change would happen in Cuba and that Cuban President Raul Castro understood that.
      The two leaders met to talk about trade and held a joint news conference.
      Mr Castro denied that there are political prisoners in Cuba, telling journalists to "give him a list" and then they would be released "tonight".
      He also defended Cuba's record on human rights and pointed to problems in the US.
      "We defend human rights, in our view civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights are indivisible, inter-dependent and universal," Mr Castro said.
      "Actually we find it inconceivable that a government does not defend and ensure the right to healthcare, education, social security, food provision and development."
      Mr Obama said the trade embargo would be fully lifted in Cuba, but he could not say exactly when.
      "The reason is what we did for 50 years did not serve our interests or the interests of the Cuban people," he said.
      For decades, the US and Cuba were engaged in a bitter stand-off, triggered by the overthrow of US-backed Cuban dictator Fulgencio Batista by Communist leader Fidel Castro in 1959.
      The US broke off diplomatic relations and imposed a trade embargo.
      But President Obama undertook two years of secret talks which led to the announcement in December 2014 that the two countries would restore diplomatic relations.
      Since then, there have been a series of symbolic moments, such as the first formal meeting of Presidents Obama and Castro at a regional summit in Panama and the opening of embassies in Havana and Washington DC.
      http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-35856126
      Structure of the Lead
      who-President Barack Obama
      what-visit to the island and talks with its communist leader.
      where-in Cuba
      why-for a historic three-day visit
      How-not given
      When-not given
      Keywords:
       communist 共產
       heralded 先驅
      indivisible 不可分割
      inconceivable 不可思議
      diplomatic  外交